The only scandals about the nascent PTI government, coming out in rapid succession, (three since it took office in mid August) are the ones in which the police is the initiator of the blame. Two of the scandals (Gondal scandal and sons of Mahmud ul Rashid scandal) involve officers of the police from Pakistan’s largest and most prosperous province, Punjab, while one has surfaced in Haiderabad, Sindh, where police accused a PTI leader of taking drugs. The most prominent case is that of District Police Officer (DPO) Rizwan Gondal, subjudice in Supreme Court at the time of writing. The case is likely to be known in Pakistan’s judicial history as a very significant case, and may become the catalyst for fundamental reform in both the ethos of the police as well as the socio-political environment in which the police functions in Pakistan.
Police is, by all standards, the most corrupt institution in Pakistan. It is also
the institution most abused by power, be it feudal, political, bureaucratic, or naked financial power. The tradition of abusing police and making it subservient to political power has been carried over from British colonial times, when the British administrators co-opted the Indian elite to deliver peace to the colonial masters and help fulfill imperial economic needs. The police was made subservient to the elite in order to enable the latter to smoothly service the imperial rulers.
During India’s administration by the East India Company, localized battles with officers of the East India Company were frequent in different parts of India. East India Company found it convenient to maintain peace between their administration and the Indian subjects by forming alliance with the Indian feudal elite class, and by politically empowering it with titles, plus clout with the Company, in order that they may have an incentive to prevent the local population from carrying out insurrections against the British. Sustained use of this practice led to the law enforcement at local levels being deferential to the local elite, and the latter utilizing the local police as their vassal without fearing reprisals from colonial rulers. If a police officer was abused by a local feudal elite, he could go home or knuckle under. The East India Company could ill afford to alienate the local elite if he showed dislike for the police officer. From 1757 to 1857, the formula enabled the British East India Company to administer India.
Company officials were rattled when the arrangement backfired in 1857, intensely in some places. Examples were set by hanging bodies of India’s elites, defeated in battles with the Company Bahadurs, from tree tops for days, to teach others a lesson. The breakdown of East India Company led order invited Crown’s intervention and end of direct rule by the Company. However, the crown too had no better formula for governing India’s vast expanse, and continued the practice of utilizing the influence local feudal elite had over the local population for the benefit of the Raj, even if it entailed putting the local police at the disposal of the local elite. Surface police reforms were carried out from time to time, to have something to write London about.
The colonial practice continues in the South Asian countries of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. However, matters of police stand a greater chance of changing for the better in Pakistan now than at any other juncture in history. This is so due to a distinct development unique to Pakistan, unlike its other neighbors. Pakistan’s economy is undergoing transformation as its ruling elite realizes that their country enjoys an unprecedented opportunity of prospering through becoming a regional commercial hub and a busy international trading port. To this effect, during the last four years, foreign investments are encouraged and economic corridors are being built in collaboration with globally strong economies such as China and Saudi Arabia.
A commercially bustling environment, involving active participation of global financial elite, must be manned by an effective police. It is therefore imperative that real reform in the character and practice of policing Pakistan is carried out. This time, Pakistan is cognizant of the fact that its commercial value will draw foreign direct investment from regional as well as international actors. Had it expected the investment to arrive from one single source, it could have let the same source imperceptibly slip into “elite above the law mode,” due to the single source’s unrivaled position in Pakistan’s economy.
To inspire confidence in foreign investors from several different countries, the law and order environment in Pakistan must be secured in a sustainable manner. So far, the Pakistan military has taken care of providing security to the China Pak Economic Corridor. However, it cannot, and should not, continue to define the details of domestic security. The police is an indispensable institution in this regard. It is vital that it transforms itself from an institution that abuses power at its disposal, with impunity, to one that must guard society with the power vested in it. Fundamental changes within the organizational character, cultural ethos, and training methodologies of the police must take place. The changes must be capable of breaking with the age old and entrenched tradition of a police order at the disposal of the elite, to be utilized by the latter as they will.
Cultivation of a socio-political environment in which police can survive with independence and dignity, and earn accolades instead of punishment for standing up to power, is therefore necessary.
In this regard, two vital institutions in Pakistan, the Supreme Court of Pakistan under Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and the Prime Minister’s office under Imran Khan, have both chosen to act with unprecedented zeal and candor, respectively. The Chief Justice has shown zero tolerance for the actions of the political elite who unduly interfere with police work. He has summoned the Chief Minister of Punjab, Usman Buzdar, along with the latter’s friends, and the IG police, in suo moto hearing of the Rizwan Gondal case, and threatened with dire consequences if court found any one of them guilty of unduly interfering with police work in Punjab. The Prime Minister, Imran Khan, has maintained a candid distance from the Chief Minister he himself appointed, deferring to the court in letter and spirit. No comment, what so ever, has been issued from the Prime Minister’s Office as Imran Khan’s appointed Chief Minister in the most powerful province of Punjab is summoned to the court upon complaint by district police officer Rizwan Gondal. Realizing he is not going to get any help from his party leadership, Usman Buzdar is seen humbly bowing to the Chief Justice, admitting he made a mistake, and begging forgiveness. No indictments have taken place in the Gondal case yet, but it seems the Chief Justice is in no mood to easily give up on an opportunity to discipline the elite. He may not consign the matter to record because he has received an apology. He seems cognizant of the crux of the matter. Pakistan can not grow into a regional hub and an operational economic power house without a modern, viable, and thoroughly independent system of police.
Prime Minister Imran Khan too seems amply aware of this imperative. He did not defend his Chief Minister, Usman Buzdar, even once during the hearing currently underway in the Supreme Court. He did, on the other hand, object to DPO Rizwan Gondal’s recourse to social media to complain about how the Chief Minister arm twisted him, instead of lodging formal complaint along the chain of command, even if it entailed arriving at the apex court in the end.
Both the Chief Justice and the Prime Minister are rightly laying their respective emphasis where it belongs. In the process, an unprecedented and auspicious environment has been created for giving Pakistan “new police for the new millennium.” To sustain the environment, it must be ensured that the corrective oversight continues beyond the term of the current chief justice Saqib Nisar. The court is of greater relevance than the Prime Minister in this regard.